Review: rust-udisks2 0.3.1-1
New Package Report
.changes
| Version | 0.3.1-1 |
|---|---|
| Changed-By | Jeremy Bícha |
| Architecture | source amd64 |
| Distribution | unstable |
| Date | Sat, 27 Sep 2025 16:40:26 -0400 |
| Source | rust-udisks2 |
.dsc
| Section | rust |
|---|---|
| Priority | optional |
| Component | main |
| Package-List | librust-udisks2-dev deb rust optional arch=any |
debian/copyright
Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Upstream-Name: udisks2 Source: https://github.com/FineFindus/udisks-rs Files: * Copyright: 2023-2025 FineFindus License: LGPL-2+ Files: org.freedesktop.UDisks2.xml Copyright: 2011 David Zeuthen <zeuthen@gmail.com> License: LGPL-2+ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2025 Debian Rust Maintainers <pkg-rust-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net> 2025 Jeremy Bícha <jbicha@ubuntu.com> License: LGPL-2+ License: LGPL-2+ Debian systems provide the LGPL 2.1 in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2
Review Information
accepted — allocated to siretart 1 month, 15 days ago, started 1 month, 15 days ago, completed 1 month, 13 days ago.
Final Comment
So the upstream code as presented contains this notice in Cargo.toml
license = "LGPL-2.1"
However, debian/copyright states:
License: LGPL-2+
This is a licensing change that upstream has not included in the 3.1 release which is packaged:
https://github.com/FineFindus/udisks-rs/commit/6359a37560f3bbeaab2b8d79ddec245cad9ec08b
This is technically a discrepancy between Debian/copyright and the source code, please do rectify this in your next upload by either packaging the most recent git snapshot or updating Debian/copyright to match the license of the source code.
Public Notes
So the upstream code as presented contains this notice in Cargo.toml
license = "LGPL-2.1"
However, debian/copyright states:
License: LGPL-2+
This is a licensing change that upstream has not included in the 3.1 release which is packaged:
https://github.com/FineFindus/udisks-rs/commit/6359a37560f3bbeaab2b8d79ddec245cad9ec08b
This is technically a discrepancy between Debian/copyright and the source code, but it feels really technical and minor. Are we good to accept it with a comment here?
Licenserecon
Command: lrc
Exit code: 3
en: Versions: licenserecon '11.0' licensecheck '3.3.9-1'
Parsing Source Tree ....
Reading d/copyright ....
Running licensecheck ....
d/copyright | licensecheck
LGPL-2+ | LGPL-2.1 LICENSE
copyright check
Command: cme check dpkg-copyright
Exit code: 0
(no output)
If there is no other license statement we should agree with comment